Friday, May 1, 2015

Friday, November 21, 2014

Legal or Lawful?

It is crucial to define the difference between legal and lawful. The generic Constitution references genuine law. The present civil magistrates/judges and their courts use the word legal. Is there a difference in the meanings? The following is quoted from A Dictionary of Law 1893:

Lawful. In accordance with the law of the land; according to the law; permitted, sanctioned, or justified by law. “Lawful” properly implies a thing conformable to or enjoined by law; “Legal”, a thing in the form or after the manner of law or binding by law. A writ or warrant issuing from any court, under color of law, is a “legal” process however defective. 

Legal. Latin legalis. Pertaining to the understanding, the exposition, the administration, the science and the practice of law: as, the legal profession, legal advice; legal blanks, newspaper. Implied or imputed in law. Opposed to actual.

“Legal” looks more to the letter [form/appearance], and “Lawful” to the spirit [substance/content], of the law. “Legal” is more appropriate for conformity to positive rules of law; “Lawful” for accord with ethical principle. “Legal” imports rather that the forms [appearances] of law are observed, that the proceeding is correct in method, that rules prescribed have been obeyed; “Lawful” that the right is actful in substance, that moral quality is secured. “Legal” is the antithesis of equitable, and the equivalent of constructive. 2 Abbott’s Law Dic. 24. 

Legal matters administrate, conform to, and follow rules. They are equitable in nature and are implied (presumed) rather than actual (expressed). A legal process can be defective in law. This accords with the previous discussions of legal fictions and color of law. To be legal, a matter does not follow the law. Instead, it conforms to and follows the rules or form of law. This may help you to understand why the Federal and State Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure are cited in every court petition so as to conform to legal requirements of the specific juristic persons named, e.g., “STATE OF WISCONSIN”, etc. or the “U.S. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT” that rule the courts.

Lawful matters are ethically enjoined in the law of the land—the law of the people—and are actual in nature, not implied. This is why whatever true law was upheld by the organic Constitution has no bearing or authority in the present day legal courts. It is impossible for anyone in alleged “authority” today to access, or even take cognizance of, true law since “authority” is the “law of necessity,” 12 USC 95.

Therefore, it would appear that the meaning of the word “legal” is “color of law,” a term which Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, defines as:

Color of law. The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal right. Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state, is an action taken under “color of law.” Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, page 241.

Friday, February 7, 2014

Constitutional Authority ?

Why in the Constitution, are the words 'People' and 'Posterity' capitalized?
Before that question is answered, take note of this definition: a capitonym is a word that changes its meaning (and sometimes pronunciation) when it is capitalized, and usually applies to capitalization due to proper nouns or eponyms.


We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America

There is obviously no living signatory to that declaration (Constitution) - contract, so the next question to ask is:
Are "We" then considered to be one of "We the People"? 
Answer: When the authors capitalized these words (capitonym), the meaning was changed to reflect a particular group of "People" and the "Prosperity" was for the authors' future generations, not ours.

This simply means that the U.S. Constitution may only apply to those who have  sworn an oath to uphold it.
(public officials/servants and police/military personnel)  
Have an issue with that? - see the definition of 'cognitive dissonance'.
This is NOT suggesting that the INTENT of the authors' wasn't honorable.  However, when dealing with CONTRACT LAW - all facets must be thoroughly studied. 

Definition of CONSTITUTION, contracts. The constitution of a contract, is the making of the contract as, the written constitution of a debt. 1 Bell's Com. 332, 5th ed.

Definition of CONSTITUTOR, civil law. He who promised by a simple pact to pay the debt of another; and this is always a principal obligation. Inst. 4, 6, 9.

No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority

The Constitution has no inherent authority or obligation. It has no authority or obligation at all, unless as a contract between man and man. And it does not so much as even purport to be a contract between persons now existing. 

It purports, at most, to be only a contract between persons living...And it can be supposed to have been a contract then only between persons who had already come to years of discretion, so as to be competent to make reasonable and obligatory contracts.

Friday, January 25, 2013

So you wish to "End the Fed"?

First, are you ready to change your way of thinking?

Don't wish to endorse the Federal Reserve Bank?  Read on...

It's actually been in the way we've been endorsing checks, that has been the issue.  The solution step by step:

1.  Stop automatic deposits, and get checks for payment.
2.  Endorse only as shown below and then take cash.
3   If the check is to large for bank to cash, get a bank certified check and when ready to cash it, do it all over again.
4.  Make all bill payments in postal money orders only.
5.  Ideally, open up a brand new account at a credit union (they are usually more amiable) and then put this endorsement below right on the signature card.

Now your saying, what?!? This is not very convenient. Well, it's been made very easy to be a banker... and that is indeed what you are, when dealing in private credit.  Too much work you say, well, then go back to paying all those user fees (taxes).

Endorsing Fed. Private $ = Income = Subject to taxes

Still wish to vote to endorse/support the Fed?

If no, then here is proper endorsement:


Video above is shortened audio version of this conf call

- ignore the religious overtones (if that would bother you)

summary article

Saturday, July 14, 2012

Expose on Life

Click on link above to download PowerPoint and view in slideshow mode. 

Lots of other hyperlinks to keep you busy, entertained and enlightened.  Have fun!  Comments and counterpoints are welcome here and/or on -

ADD to Bookmarks:  http://sundayupdate.wordpress.com

Friday, April 15, 2011

The 5 words used to control / enslave you

Note:  Many well-known freedom movement spokesmen/women have not been willing to fully discuss and/or expose this subject for reasons known only to them.  Why? Because they think it's either too trivial, they don't fully understand it or perhaps in their mind, it's been debunked by an attorney they give credence too, without doing their own thorough due diligence.  It is also important to note that there are some well intentioned lawyers who strive to assist in making our world a safer and better place for all to live.  The intention of this article is to shine a bright light and empower you to help break the matrix grip.

First and foremost, it is vitally important to comprehend that everything in the business / commercial world is done by contract, both public and private.   Secondly, relationships are also contractual  - marital, parental and social (friendships).  You both consciously and unconsciously verbally contract all day long, and when merited, in written form as well.  

Words are understood to be very powerful and it is through spelling, that spells are cast.   However, it is a very misunderstood fact, that words used in everyday language, most often do not have the same meaning in a legal sense (contractual or in a court setting).

What are these 5 words that are used to control / enslave you?  = person, resident, citizen, driver and passenger (all commercial terms).  In my humble opinion, it is these 5 words that are the keys to casting the spell in the attorneys’ legal jargon trickery.  All commercial transactions / contracts have been designed to remove the men and women from the equation and replace with a legal fictional entity in the matrix system.

PERSON is a legal entity - a trust, corporation, partnership, association.   Don't be fooled by the attorney's statutory word trickery if you see - "natural person".  An adjective cannot change the root meaning of a word.   Plain and simple, it is impossible to be a "person".  You are either a man or woman - a living being.   A 'person' is a dead entity and attorneys may only represent persons – commercial legal entities. 

RESIDENT is the word term used to establish jurisdiction in a State (a legal entity).  To "reside" is a commercial term only used to establish domicile for tax revenue purposes. 

CITIZEN is the word term used to establish jurisdiction in a Federal district.  It is also a commercial term only used to establish domicile for tax revenue purposes.  The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) may only tax those people who have voluntarily deemed themselves internal to the district.  Thus only legal entities have tax liability.

DRIVER is a For Hire / paid operator of a motor vehicle.  The term 'motor vehicle' is defined as every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.

PASSENGER is someone who pays a fare for passage on a commercial carrier - airplane, bus, taxi, limousine, cruise ship, train or trolley, rather than a 'guest' who travels without charge or fee.

It is necessary to go to the very root when looking at a complex problem.  It is obvious that most politicians and their key staff are attorneys/lawyers, who are minions in servitude to the bankers. The simplest solution is to start removing the attorneys from office.

Take note of these quotes:

"In a recent conversation with an official at the Internal Revenue Service, I was amazed when he told me that 'If the taxpayers of this country ever discover that the IRS operates on 90% bluff, the entire system will collapse'." -- Henry Bellmon, U.S. Senator (1969).

"Our tax system is based on individual self-assessment and voluntary compliance." - Mortimer Caplin, former Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Internal Revenue Audit Manual (1975).

"Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are U.S. government institutions.  They are not ... they are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the U.S. for the benefit of themselves and their foreign and domestic swindlers, and rich and predatory money lenders.  The sack of the United States by the Fed is the greatest crime in history.  Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers, but the truth is the Fed has usurped the government.   It controls everything here and it controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will." -- Congressman Charles McFadden, Chairman, House Banking and Currency Committee, June 10, 1932.

"The real truth of the matter is, and you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson.  History depicts Andrew Jackson as the last truly honorable and incorruptible American president." -- President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, November 23, 1933 in a letter to Colonel Edward Mandell House. 

"... our system of credit is concentrated ... in the hands of a few men .. a power so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that [we had] better not speak above [our] breath when [we] speak in condemnation of it ... We have come to be ... completely controlled ... by ... small groups of dominant men." -- President Woodrow Wilson.

"The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes" -- Felix Frankfurter, United States Supreme Court Justice.

"Give me control over a nation's currency and I care not who makes its laws." -- Baron M.A. Rothschild (1744 - 1812)

The Solution for unraveling control in the matrix grip:

The NAME = all Capital letter designation - JOHN DOE or JANE DOE is the corporate legal entity = person (also known as - strawman).  

This is not a trivial matter.  The key to your freedom is to know that you are not this NAME / PERSON.  The voluntary act of identifying yourself in a legal contractual setting without proper status declaration will continue your enslavement to the system.  You are a living being. 

There are 4 ways to respond when offered a contract - acceptance, conditional acceptance, rejection or going silent (acquiescence).  The first two choices are honorable and the last two choices are dishonorable.   

Why is a judge referred to as "Your Honor"? – It’s because he/she is weighing who is before him/her and remaining in honor... like a mirror and also weighing who will get into argument and therefore acting in dishonor.


You will always lose unless you abide by the rules of the matrix game. You will probably lose even if you use the rules, because you will argue and that is what the "controllers" want you to do, argue.  When you argue, you are in dishonor.   This is unfortunately how we’ve been conditioned.

Forget about the law. The law is only for those that have violated some tenet of commerce.

Remember, everything in this world is a contract. When you go to the store to purchase a quart of milk, you are about to enter into a contract. When you pick up the milk and pay for it, the clerk will give you a receipt. This receipt is the title to the quart of milk. If you discard the receipt before you leave the store and you leave the store, you could be charged with stealing since you do not have the title to the milk.

You will probably begin to argue. Once you begin to argue, you are in dishonor and when you are in dishonor nothing matters except getting back in honor.

Here is a 'biblical story' allegory example:  Jesus came upon the land to teach people how to operate in commerce. His main purpose was to save us from our dishonor. Yet we persist in this dishonor by acquiring things, which we are treating as little demigods.

One of the best lessons Jesus taught was by his example. On his trip to Galilee, he encountered three beggars, who called out and said "Jesus, heal us"!  They were offering Jesus a contract.

There are four possible ways in which to answer when one is offered a contract.

a. Agree to the contract and you are in honor.

b. Remain silent (considered insolent) and therefore you are in dishonor.

c. To argue about the contract is a dishonor. That is why the courts want you to have an attorney. Attorneys argue and get you in dishonor.  They are there to turn you in!

d. Doing a novation is like bargaining and it is a conditional acceptance. For example, if a merchant is selling apples for one dollar each and you want an apple, but you don't want to pay a dollar, you may offer fifty cents.  This is bartering, not dishonor and you are remaining in honor. You have just placed the merchant in the position of having to make one of the same four choices on how to answer.  You will probably walk away and he will lose the sale if he declines by arguing or remaining silent.  He lost because he dishonored you.  He remains in honor if he chooses 'd'.

Getting back to the lesson. The beggars offered Jesus a contract. Jesus replied, “What would you have me do?” He is now doing a novation to the contract. Before he can comply, he has to know what the contract requires.  The beggars then re-offered the contract to Jesus by saying, "make us see".  He then agreed by saying, "you are healed". The beggars and Jesus were always in honor and the contract was completed and everyone was satisfied.

In a court setting, you should re-offer the Judge, by stating:  Your Honor, I conditionally accept your offer to give you a NAME upon Proof of Claim that if I do so, it will not bind me to any contract with the State of XYZ (whatever jurisdiction you are supposedly in). The judge will keep trying to get you into contract. You must continue to conditionally accepting the judge’s offer by continually repeating, upon Proof of whatever Claim they are making.

The case is The State of XXY v. JOHN DOE. The judge asks you…How do you plead, Guilty or Not Guilty? or he may say Responsible or Not Responsible?  Your answer: Your honor, I conditionally accept your offer to plead upon Proof of Claim that the State of XYX is an injured or the State of XYZ and I have a contract and upon Proof of Claim that the XYZ on the complaint, in all upper case letters is not a legal fiction and upon Proof of Claim that, I, a living being, am a corporation.


The people of the courts and all levels of government presume that you are a corporation because all courts and governments are legal fictions and following the law of like kind can only deal with other legal fictions or incompetent persons.  All government codes/statutes (laws) deal only with persons, corporations, trusts, partnerships or other like entities. They are not real. They only exist on paper (in form). They do not exist in the physical sense (substance).

A city, a county and a state have lines drawn on a map that show (what they claim to be) their jurisdiction. There are buildings that are referred to as schools, courts, offices and other titles.  They are real because they are made with gravel, cement, wood and other physical materials. The government is a fiction created from a man's imagination.  It is of course not real, and only an image in people's minds.  It cannot do anything without the physical man. The physical man has a ‘go between’ and that ‘go between’ is a legal fiction.  It is a transmitting utility. Just like the electric power company manufactures electrical power for business or home use, the transmission lines are the transmitting utility that connects them together.  The person - legal entity - strawman - all capital letter name fictional corporation is the transmitting utility between the flesh and blood man and the government and its agencies.

Presumption comes into play when you receive a contract from the government, a police officer, court, etc., and if you do not correct them, they will presume that you are the all capital letter NAME - legal entity. It is when you don't correct them that the presumption becomes a stipulation of fact.


A stipulation is an agreement that the facts of the case are not in dispute and therefore will not and cannot be addressed from the point of stipulation.  The way that you get into a contract is by doing something that you may be unaware of... like a drivers license.  You are offering the State to allow you to operate a vehicle in a commercial venture on the roadways within the State, when you apply for a driver’s license.

Whomever offers the contract has the energy or the power because they are the Creditor. The one who is being offered the contract is the Debtor. You always want to be the Creditor.  Now, while you are operating the vehicle in commerce, you violate a rule (law) that you agreed to abide by accepting the license.

You were the Creditor when you applied for a license, and were in honor. They were the Debtor. Then they re-offered you the license, making them the Creditor and you the Debtor. Everyone is still in honor when you accepted the license (contract).   When you violate some rule (law), you are in dishonor and have to go to a hearing (court). Once again, you are going through the same rules. Honor and dishonor.


Condition yourself to remember that everything is a contract.  When somebody offers you a contract and you do not like the terms, simply re-offer or counter-offer.  When a debt collector sends a letter / a collection notice that is a contract. You now have the choices of a, b, c, and d.  What are you going to do? The thing not to do is argue or remain silent. You must re-offer in a timely manner.

"Mr. Debt Collector, I conditionally accept your offer pay the debt indicated, upon Proof of Claim that you are the owner of the debt and upon Proof of Claim that you and I have a signed contract.

When a police officer pulls you over and offers you a ticket for speeding, the ticket is a contract. When he asks you to sign the ticket, stating that you promise to appear at a certain date, that is a contract. You may properly do two things.
1. You may demand that the police officer takes you to a Judge/Magistrate immediately or;

2. You may sign the ticket: All rights reserved, UCC 1-308, and then sign the Name below what you just wrote on the ticket.  This action allows you 72 hours to rescind the contract. A widely recognized and universal law of commerce is that contracts can be canceled within 72 hours. Many contracts include a document titled "notice of rescission." The buyer, in most cases, must execute / sign and date the document and get it into the possession of the seller in order to properly rescind the sale.

If you are arrested and taken before a Magistrate, he/she will ask you to state your Name. The Magistrate is making you an offer to enter their jurisdiction.  Next you will be invited to sign the paper the clerk offers you.  You will be in a contract if you sign it.

If you are about to go into court, it is vitally important to declare that you are not a corporation prior to a hearing or trial.  Otherwise, the judge will find your silence on that point a fact and then proceed under the presumption that you are a corporation.

Please remember, you are not a Name.  You are a very powerful living being when in honor.
=== Thanks to Activist Post for helping this article go viral ===

check out the image they added and what it says

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Are you a U.S. Citizen or Not ?!?

People need to wake up to the reality of what is truly going on with this country known as America.  Most importantly, this raises the defining question, do you really wish to be classified as a U.S. Citizen? When I ask people, Are you a U.S. Citizen? ... and of course, most say YES, then I inform them about the U.S. Code [actual citing 28 USC 3002 (15) A] that defines the U.S. as a corporation:

I then ask, "can you be a Citizen of Wal-Mart or Microsoft "?  which of course they say NO, but then some try to say, well this is a country... which my response to that is, not by definition it is not!  The united States of America was a nation set up as a republic, but when you read this link: www.barefootsworld.net/usfraud.html you find out when that all changed in 1933 and why it is now a corporation. The UNITED STATES CODE (USC) is the UNITED STATES corporation’s governing code, period.  

Some people will attempt to say that they are citizens of the "California" (insert any State here) Republic.  Okay, but there is no longer a Republic, anywhere, any more!  People need to start reading and understanding how attorneys/ lawyers have altered the meaning of some common every day words to serve the corporate interests.  Some may call it legalese, and of course that is what it is, however this has all been cloaked on purpose.   The attorneys, serving their masters, the international banking cartel or “banksters”, used legal trickery to form these non-existent legal entities -- cities, counties, states, supposed federal governments, and in doing so, have created a monster big brother police state corporation.  Yes indeed boys & girls, the STATES are not sovereign as some people think, they are all under the big corporate umbrella -- UNITED STATES -- and interestingly enough, this happened in 1933 as well.   www.csg.org  and go research the U.S. Code ! 

“Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws” ~ Mayer Amschel Rothschild

In 1933, the government was incorporated, or commercialized. To Commercialize means to "EXPLOIT."  Therein lies the reason why  "THE ATTORNEYS", changed this conventional government to a legal fiction. This was to exploit with words, and done so by the very men or women that hide behind the names or words.

Excerpt from book, “WOE UNTO YOU LAWYERS”, written in 1939 by Fred Rodell, Professor of Law, Yale University:

It is the lawyers who run our civilization for us – our governments, our business, our private lives. Most legislators are lawyers; they make our laws. Most presidents, governors, commissioners, along with their advisers and brain-trusters are lawyers; they administer our laws. All the judges are lawyers; they interpret and enforce our laws. There is no separation of powers where the lawyers are concerned. There is only a concentration of all government power – in the lawyers.  As the schoolboy put it, ours is “a government of lawyers, not of men.”

It is not the businessmen, no matter how big, who run our economic world. Again it is the lawyers, the lawyers who “advise” and direct every time a company is formed, every time a bond or a share of stock is issued, almost every time material is to be bought or goods to be sold, every time a deal is made. The whole elaborate structure of industry and finance is a lawyer-made house. We all live in it, but the lawyers run it.

And in our private lives, we cannot buy a home or rent an apartment, we cannot get married or try to get divorced, we cannot die and leave our property to our children without calling on the lawyers to guide us. To guide us, incidentally, through a maze of confusing gestures and formalities that lawyers have created.

Let’s put this real simply, someone nearly has to look at a city’s police car to find out who they (the police officers) are truly “protecting and serving”.   For example, in the city known as Chicago, it is clearly displayed on the car, “City of Chicago, Incorporated 1837” along with it’s corporate seal. 

Now I realize that all societies need order and a set of laws, which is why I’m an advocate of private administrative remedy myself and courts of equity.   If you don’t know what that is, please go look it up.  To get an idea how whacky this corporation driven system has become, people who are working for these corporations after a while realize that there is indeed some thing terribly wrong, but most just keep their mouths shut, because it is job security and they say “hey, I am just doing my job”.    Getting back to the example of common law – how can a man or a woman injure a fictional entity, non-existent corporation?  They cannot, it is impossible. 

Excerpt example from Adventures In Legal Land  http://marcstevens.net 
Marc: Am I entitled to a fair trial/hearing?
Judge: Yes you are.
Marc: Could I get a fair trial/hearing if there is a conflict of interest?
Judge: No, you could not.
Marc: If there was a conflict of interest, would you recuse yourself?
Judge: Yes I would.
Marc: Who do you represent?
Judge: The State.
Marc: If you represent the state, and the state is the plaintiff, then you represent a party (in this case), isn’t that a conflict of interest?

Lastly, in the movie "The Interpreter" (starring Nicole Kidman & Sean Penn), this line shines a light on truth that's often revealed in movies, yet people just don't see or hear it for what it's sharing: "Despite all the flags on First Avenue, there are no nations any more, only companies - international companies.  lt's where we are. lt's what we are". - Kuman-Kuman to Slyva Broome in reference to the United Nation on First Avenue at 46th St. in New York..  ... incidentally, the tagline for the film:  The truth needs no translation.

Another great example of an allegory movie was "Wizard of Oz" – http://freedom-school.com/the_wizard_of_oz.pdf

"I was born free by Nature. Why should I accept the yoke of an involuntarily assigned “citizenship,” which sweats me at law in order to finance its murder? The Constitution of a State has no inherent authority unless as a contract between man and man, and obviously can be binding only upon those then living who acknowledged it"  ~  Lysander Spooner, 1882